CFTC Staff Letters

CFTC Staff Letters provides Letters from 2008 and later. For Letters published before 2008 visit the Letters Archive page.

PDF Description
PDF Image 25-14 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: MPD
Regulation Parts: 3.10, 23, 30.1, 48.2
Tags: Foreign Future, Swaps, Cross-border, Foreign Boards of Trade
Issuance Date:
Description:

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s Market Participants Division and Division of Market Oversight issued interpretative guidance confirming the application of certain cross-border definitions to SBC Limited.


See also: Request Letter
Requester(s): SCBL
PDF Image 25-11 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: MPD
Regulation Parts: 23.156
Tags:
Issuance Date:
Description: UST ETFs that fall within the scope of the regulatory framework set forth in SEC Rule 6c-11 may qualify as eligible IM collateral as defined in the CFTC Margin Rule, provided the funds meet the criteria listed in Commission Regulation 23.156(a)(1)(ix). CSEs may collect or post UST ETFs that qualify as IM under Commission Regulation 23.156(a)(1)(ix) as VM for uncleared swap transactions with financial end users consistent with Commission Regulation 23.156(b)(1)(ii).
See also: Request Letter
Requester(s): GMAC
PDF Image 25-10 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DMO, MPD
Regulation Parts: 1.3
Tags: Swap, Window FX Forwards, FX Spot Transactions, foreign exchange forwards, Foreign exchange spot transactions
Issuance Date:
Description: Joint MPD and DMO interpretation providing the Divisions’ views on the characterization of certain FX transactions as being swaps, foreign exchange forwards, or foreign exchange swaps, in each case, as defined in the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulations. Specifically, the Divisions state their view that: Window FX Forwards, as described in the letter, should be considered to be “foreign exchange forwards;” and Package FX Spot Transactions, as described in the letter, should not be considered to be foreign exchange swaps or swaps.
Requester(s): CFTC
PDF Image 25-06 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: MPD
Regulation Parts: 4s(e), 23.105
Tags:
Issuance Date:
Description:

Staff Interpretation allows Japanese nonbank swap dealers subject to the Japanese Comparability Order to file with the CFTC and the NFA certain enumerated schedules (the ""In Scope Schedules"") of the Annual Report to comply with condition 9 of the order. Japanese nonbank swap dealers may, but are not required to, submit the Annual Report in its entirety to comply with condition 9.


See also: Request Letter
Requester(s): SIFMA
PDF Image 21-15 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: MPD
Regulation Parts: 23.100, 23.101
Tags: SD, Swap Dealer, Tangible Net Worth
Issuance Date:
Description:

Staff Interpretation to Swap Dealers electing the Tangible Net Worth method of calculation capital under regulation 23.101.


PDF Image 20-43 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DMO, DCR
Regulation Parts: 2(h)(1), 2(h)(8)
Tags: Cleared Swaps, Clearing Requirement, Execution, Trade Execution, Trade Execution Requirement
Issuance Date:
Description:

The Divisions do not interpret Sections (2)(h)(1) and 2(h)(8) of the CEA as subjecting to the clearing and trade execution requirements certain swaps transactions entered into by a DCO to reduce and manage the risk associated with a clearing member default.


PDF Image 19-18 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DSIO
Regulation Parts: 42.2
Tags: IB, CIP, Customer Identification Program, VB, Voice Broker
Issuance Date:
Description:

The guidance clarifies the CIP and BO requirements applicable to introducing brokers (IBs) under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA). The guidance provides regulatory clarity to certain IBs who lack access to the information needed to comply with CIP and BO obligations. The guidance eliminates duplicative efforts without impacting money laundering or terrorist financing risk, as the customer due diligence obligations will continue to be performed by the futures commission merchant (FCM) that carries the customer account. The particular IBs subject to this guidance do not introduce their customers’ accounts to FCMs. The IBs do not receive or have access to the customer identification and financial information obtained by FCMs, or the monthly account information issued by FCMs. This guidance clarifies that these IBs are not required to carry out CIP and comply with BO requirements.


PDF Image 18-12 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DMO
Regulation Parts: 150.4
Tags: Aggregation, Positions
Issuance Date:
Description:

The staff letter confirms that, for purposes of applying the position limits set forth in CFTC Regulation 150.2, when an institutional investor qualifies for the Regulation 150.4(b)(1) exemption from position aggregation with respect to their investment in a fund, the institutional investor is not required to look through its investment in a fund to aggregate commodity interest positions of an underlying portfolio company in which the institutional investor may hold a 10 percent or greater indirect interest (via its investment in the fund).  


PDF Image 17-68 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DSIO
Regulation Parts: 1a(10), 4.10(d)(1)
Tags:
Issuance Date:
Description:

Interpretative relief from the definition of “commodity pool” for certain real estate holding companies.


PDF Image 17-65 Letter Type: Interpretative
Division: DSIO
Regulation Parts: 4m(1)
Tags:
Issuance Date:
Description:

A futures commission merchant (FCM), swap dealer (SD), or introducing broker (IB) that receives separate compensation for commodity trading advice is not required to register as a commodity trading advisor, provided that the offered advice is “solely incidental” to the conduct of the FCM’s or SD’s business, or “solely in connection with” the operation of the IB’s business.